Class practice and mass practice in dentistry: A review

Abstract

This review critically examines the dichotomy between class practice and mass practice in dentistry, focusing on patient outcomes, satisfaction, and implications for dental education. Class practice, characterized by individualized instruction, aims to tailor treatment plans to the unique needs of each patient. In contrast, mass practice prioritizes standardized efficiency to accommodate a larger patient population. Our analysis draws from a comprehensive review of studies indexed on PubMed, highlighting the strengths and challenges of each approach.The personalized nature of class practice fosters a deeper practitioner-patient relationship, potentially enhancing patient satisfaction and treatment adherence. However, concerns arise regarding the logistical feasibility of individualized care within time constraints. Mass practice, while efficient, raises questions about its impact on the quality of care and long-term patient outcomes.Patient satisfaction emerges as a critical metric, with class practice associated with higher levels of satisfaction due to its patient-centered approach. Efficacy and long-term outcomes reveal potential advantages for class practice, emphasizing the need for further research into the durability of treatments under different models. The practical implications for dental education underscore the importance of adapting curricula to prepare graduates for diverse practice environments.In conclusion, this review provides valuable insights for practitioners, educators, and policymakers, emphasizing the need to strike a balance between personalized care and operational efficiency in the evolving landscape of dentistry.